MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1832257725 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805790.001

Preface

2009· book-chapter· en· W1832257725 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. L. Wegner, J. B. Haddow

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is based on notes prepared for a senior undergraduate or beginning graduate course that we taught at the universities of Alberta and Victoria. It is primarily intended for use by students of mechanical and civil engineering, but it may be of interest to others. The mathematical background required for the topics covered in the book is modest and should be familiar to senior undergraduate engineering students. In particular it is assumed that a reader has a good knowledge of classical vector mechanics and linear algebra. Also, a background of the classical thermodynamics usually taught in undergraduate engineering courses is desirable. One motivation for the book is to present an introduction to continuum mechanics that requires no background in certain areas of advanced mathematics such as functional analysis and general tensor analysis. The treatment of continuum mechanics is based on Cartesian tensor analysis, but orthogonal curvilinear coordinates and corresponding physical coordinates are considered in appendices. A list of books that consider tensor analysis and applications is given at the end of chapter 1. Several of the books are out of print but may be useful to students if they can be obtained from libraries. Mathematica is used for symbolic manipulation, numerical computation, and graphs where appropriate, and its use is encouraged. Chapter 1 is a detailed introduction to Cartesian tensor analysis. It differs from some other treatments of the topic, for example, the early texts by Jeffreys and Temple, by emphasizing both symbolic and suffix notation for first-(vectors) and second-order tensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4470.333

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207