Shoot apical meristem ontogeny in <i>Arabidopsis</i> embryo explants treated with abscisic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of meristemoids and the ontogeny of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) were studied using cultured zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. LER ecotype. In the callus induction treatment, the procambial cells within the cotyledons of the embryo explants proliferated and gave rise to callus tissues. At the end of the treatment, a band of small cytoplasmic-rich cells derived from the procambium was produced and located at the outer surface of the callus. Upon transfer to the shoot induction medium (SIM) in the absence of abscisic acid (ABA), the cytoplasmic cells differentiated mainly into vascular elements and vacuolated parenchyma cells. This pattern of development negatively affected the explants’ ability to produce meristemoids and SAMs. Contrary to the control, the inclusion of ABA in the SIM resulted first in starch synthesis and accumulation in the surface cytoplasmic cells. This was followed by the formation of cytoplasmic cells among the starch-rich cells; further proliferation of the cytoplasmic cells resulted in the formation of meristemoids. The formation of tracheary elements was suppressed in the ABA-containing SIM. Upon transferring to the shoot development medium, which lacked plant growth regulators, some meristemoids differentiated into apical meristem cells. These cells had distinct nuclei and nucleoli, with little starch present. Additional cell divisions increased the size of the future SAM. Shoot buds with distinct SAMs were clearly delineated with the appearance of leaf primordia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".