MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1833061490

Nationalisms and identities among indigenous peoples : case studies from North America

2015· book· en· W1833061490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martina Neuburger, H. Peter Dörrenbächer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousNationalismDemocracyGender studiesMetisSovereigntyPolitical scienceSociologyEthnologyHistoryAnthropologyPoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Martina Neuburger/H. Peter Dorrenbacher: Introduction: Nationalisms and Identities among Indigenous Peoples - John George Hansen: Decolonizing Indigenous Histories and Justice - Linda Sue Warner/Keith Grint: War and Peace: Issues of Leadership in American Indian Communities - Sandra Busatta: The Akwesasne Mohawk at the Margin of the State - Miranda C. Laber: 'Planting the Seeds of Change': Indigenous Education, Nation-Building and Democracy in the United States - Herman Michell: Transcending the Winter Time: The Legacy of Residential Schools and the Role of Indigenous Places of Higher Learning in an Era of Reconciliation - Punyashree Panda: To Be or Not To Be Native: Residential School, Official Status and Metis Women in Maria Campbell's Halfbreed and Beatrice Culleton's In Search of April Raintree - Kevin A. Johnson/Joseph W. Anderson: The Native American Hip-Hop Nation: A Nationalist Movement for Sovereignty - Brian de Ruiter: The Empire Films Back: Constructing Identity and Resistance Through the Selective Films of Chris Eyre - Monika Ludescher: The Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America from International and Comparative Perspectives - Christina Goschenhofer/Katrin Singer: Mexican Indigeneities in Motion, Mexican Identities in Negotiation - Anne C. Uhlig: The Notion of the Nation Compared: Deafhood and Indianness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0250.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Cultures and Socio-EducationFrench-language works237,207