MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1833767540

Sedimentology of an open-marine platform of late Fransnian Age : the Simla Formation, West-central Alberta, Canada

2002· article· en· W1833767540 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Véronique Bernadette Talon

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary depositional environmentOutcropSedimentologyPaleontologyCarbonate platformReefDevonianSedimentary rockRidgeGeochemistryStructural basinOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fossiliferous limestones and dolostones of the Simla Formation were deposited 365 Ma ago in the present day areas of west-central Alberta and east-central British Columbia. This carbonate succession represents the last Frasnian depositional phase of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The Simla Formation consists of a 60-85 m­-thick succession of medium-bedded carbonates locally bearing biostromal patch reefs, and covers an area of about 80,000 km2 in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The Simla Formation passes laterally to the east in the Alberta subsurface into the fossiliferous and partly anhydritic limestones and dolostones of the Blue Ridge Member of the Graminia Formation, illustrating the shallowing platform to the east. A revision of the stratigraphic nomenclature proposes use of the term Simla Formation for the latest Frasnian carbonate units in the outcrop areas and the subsurface deposited north of the Jasper Basin. The sedimentology ofthe prograding Simla carbonate shelf reveals a shallow subtidal, open-marine depositional setting in the late Devonian. This study comprises detailed petrographic descriptions of the microfacies of six Simla outcrops in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, which are complemented with the lithofacies analysis of seven Blue Ridge cores and three time-equivalent strata deposited on nearby platforms on the southern shelf. Five microfacies have been recognized in the Simla Formation (and four lithofacies in the 40 m thick Blue Ridge Formation) representing low-to moderate-energy depositional environments in the shallow subtidal zone. The fossil assemblage, including crinoids, brachiopods, corals and stromatoporoids, is characteristic of an open-marine biota. Biostromal patch reefs developed locally on the platform most likely upon inherited low­relief paleotopography. A shallowing-upward trend has been observed, indicating a relative sea-level fall or a stillstand. Alternative correlations between outcrops over a 250 km distance indicate interfingering of shallow subtidal microfacies, illustrating a poorly differentiated platform interior. Factors such as paleotopography, storm and tidal activities, and nutrient levels likely had a dominant influence on carbonate production. The Simla platform sedimentation in the late Frasnian contrasts markedly with the underlying mid-Frasnian reefal platforms (Leduc, Nisku/Southesk). The abundance of calcareous particles such as foraminifera, calcareous algae, moravamminidae, and calcimicrobes, indicates a diverse Simla benthic community which was often dominated by calcareous green algae. No erosional surfaces were observed at the top of the Simla Formation. The similarity between the Frasnian Simla and the overlying Famennian Palliser microfacies suggests a rather transitional sedimentary environment across the Frasnian-Famennian boundary. This boundary is distinguished with regards to a faunal depauperization in the Famennian, relative to the Late Devonian mass extinction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207