MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Topological Mott Insulator in Three-Dimensional Systems with Quadratic Band Touching

2014· article· en· W1834675024 on OpenAlexaff
Igor F. Herbut, Lukas Janssen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMott insulatorTopological insulatorQuadratic equationPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Condensed matter physicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We argue that a three-dimensional electronic system with the Fermi level at the quadratic band touching point such as HgTe could be unstable with respect to the spontaneous formation of the (topological) Mott insulator at arbitrary weak long-range Coulomb interaction. The mechanism of the instability can be understood as the collision of Abrikosov's non-Fermi liquid fixed point with another, quantum critical, fixed point, which approaches it in the coupling space as the system's dimensionality $d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{d}_{\text{low}}+$, with the ``lower critical dimension'' $2<{d}_{\text{low}}<4$. Arguments for the existence of the quantum critical point based on considerations in the large-$N$ limit in $d=3$, as well as close to $d=2$, are given. In the one-loop calculation we find that ${d}_{\text{low}}=3.26$, and thus above, but not far from three dimensions. This translates into a temperature or energy window (${T}_{\mathrm{c}}$, ${T}_{*}$) over which the non-Fermi liquid scaling should still be observable, before the Mott transition finally takes place at the critical temperature ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}\ensuremath{\sim}{T}_{*}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}zC/({d}_{\text{low}}\ensuremath{-}d{)}^{1/2}]$. We estimate $C=\ensuremath{\pi}/1.1$, dynamical critical exponent $z\ensuremath{\approx}1.8$, and the temperature scale ${k}_{B}{T}_{*}\ensuremath{\approx}(4m/{m}_{\text{el}}{ϵ}^{2})13.6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, with $m$ as the band mass and $ϵ$ as the dielectric constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207