MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1835404685 · doi:10.29173/cjs5618

Leon Feinstein, Kathryn Duckworth, and Ricardo Sabates, Education and the Family: Passing Success across Generations.

2009· article· en· W1835404685 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark McKerrow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyEpistemologySocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R esearch consistently finds that the more education parents have, the lower the probability that their children will experience undesirable outcomes, such as unemployment and mental health problems.Feinstein, Duckworth, and Sabates' book explores the relationship between parents' education and children's outcomes, especially between parents' education and children's outcomes, especially their educational outcomes.The book is an effort to integrate existing literature in a single conceptual scheme, and a clear and simple theoretical framework is the book's strength.Applying human ecological theory (which addresses human development and the interaction of individuals with their social environments) Feinstein et al. have thought carefully about many factors that could link parents' education to children's outcomes and the various pathways through which these factors may have their effects.However, both readers interested in original analysis on this important topic and readers interested in finding out how important a role education plays in intergenerational mobility will find this book disappointing.Of the 9 chapters, only one (Chapter 8) includes original analysis.In this chapter, Feinstein et al. predict who will experience one or more undesirable outcomes later in life, but they fail to demonstrate that any particular policy intervention might be effective.Indeed, Feinstein et al. argue that a wide range of variables are important, but we do not really know if all of these variables collectively would explain the relationship between parents' education and children's outcomes, or even if they would explain an important proportion of the relationship.It is not the stated aim of the book to make these determinations, but some readers will be surprised that it lacks a meaningful attempt to empirically engage the questions it raises.Returning to the book's strength -a theoretical synthesis of a large body of research -Feinstein et al. distinguish between distal factors and proximal processes.Proximal processes, which are processes that have a direct effect on children's outcomes, are interactions between individ-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207