Leon Feinstein, Kathryn Duckworth, and Ricardo Sabates, Education and the Family: Passing Success across Generations.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
R esearch consistently finds that the more education parents have, the lower the probability that their children will experience undesirable outcomes, such as unemployment and mental health problems.Feinstein, Duckworth, and Sabates' book explores the relationship between parents' education and children's outcomes, especially between parents' education and children's outcomes, especially their educational outcomes.The book is an effort to integrate existing literature in a single conceptual scheme, and a clear and simple theoretical framework is the book's strength.Applying human ecological theory (which addresses human development and the interaction of individuals with their social environments) Feinstein et al. have thought carefully about many factors that could link parents' education to children's outcomes and the various pathways through which these factors may have their effects.However, both readers interested in original analysis on this important topic and readers interested in finding out how important a role education plays in intergenerational mobility will find this book disappointing.Of the 9 chapters, only one (Chapter 8) includes original analysis.In this chapter, Feinstein et al. predict who will experience one or more undesirable outcomes later in life, but they fail to demonstrate that any particular policy intervention might be effective.Indeed, Feinstein et al. argue that a wide range of variables are important, but we do not really know if all of these variables collectively would explain the relationship between parents' education and children's outcomes, or even if they would explain an important proportion of the relationship.It is not the stated aim of the book to make these determinations, but some readers will be surprised that it lacks a meaningful attempt to empirically engage the questions it raises.Returning to the book's strength -a theoretical synthesis of a large body of research -Feinstein et al. distinguish between distal factors and proximal processes.Proximal processes, which are processes that have a direct effect on children's outcomes, are interactions between individ-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".