Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 1999, China’s State Council has made a series of significant policy adjustments on the development of higher education. Among these the most important and profound one is a new deal of expanded enrolment. Meanwhile, this new policy has also raised a variety of policy dilemmas. This paper conducts an analysis of the expanded enrolment policy from the perspective of social policy, with a purpose of providing help for the research of China’s higher education reform. Key words: China’s higher education, expanded enrolment policy, social policy analysis Resume: Depuis 1999, le Conseil des Affaires d’Etat de la Chine a pris une serie de politiques signifiantes pour ajuster le developpement de l’education superieure. Parmi les plus importantes se trouve une qui vise au recrutement elargi. En meme temps, cette nouvelle politique a cause aussi des dilemmes. L’article present procede a une analyse de la politique de recrutment elargi dans la percpective de la politique sociale dans l’intention de donner une aide aux recherches de la reforme de l’education superieure chinoise. Mots-Cles: education superieure de Chine, politique de recrutement elargi, analyse de politique sociale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".