MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1835747939

NOT AN ABSENT ORDER BUT "AN ORDERED ABSENCE": LIFE CYCLE POEMS IN MARGARET ATWOOD'S ECOPOETRY

2015· article· en· W1835747939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inas Samy Abolfotoh

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryOrder (exchange)EcocriticismFeelingHumanityEnvironmental ethicsLiteratureSocial orderAnthropocentrismHistoryPhilosophyLawArtTheologyPolitical scienceEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nature abuse is commonly ascribed to man's will to impose order on it. Humanity's anthropocentric violations of Nature, Margaret Atwood believes, stem from their sense of lack of order in it or their inability to understand this order. So they begin imposing theirs as poet highlights in Progressive Insanities of a Pioneer (The Animals in That Country 36-39, 1968). The poem depicts a European pioneer's disharmony and lack of unity with wild lands of Canada. To appease his feelings of dislocation on this new land, he begins doing what he excels at: enforcing his order on land to retain feelings of security through controlling his unsystematic surroundings. [D]isgusted at hearing random Natural sounds of the swamp's clamourings and outbursts / of rocks, he arrogantly declares: This is not order / but / of order. // He was unanswering / implied. The forest assures that pioneer is wrong, and poet playing with words affirms that: It was / an absence. The present paper highlights Atwood's presentation of this ordered absence which appears clearly in her life cycle poems in light of Ecocriticism. The poems shed light on poet's rhapsodic ecopoetry that celebrates a universal Natural discipline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207