Measuring Religiosity and Workplace Spirituality in Pakistan: a Case Study of Armed Forces and University Teachers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reviews workplace spirituality that began as a grass-root movement and has now become a philosophy used to better management in achieving its organizational goals. The concept however is still strange to countries like Pakistan which are swamped with ignorance and business myopia.The article finds out the extent to which the sectors like Pak. Army and Teaching are experiencing religiosity and workplace spirituality. For this, individuals have been selected from different age groups and positions and case study methodology has been implemented. The study finds out that both sectors experience spirituality and religiosity more or less to a certain extent but at the same time fail to identify any organization where workplace spirituality is being followed in letter and spirit. Key words: Religion; Workplace SpiritualityResume: L'article passe en revue la spiritualite en milieu de travail en tant qu'un mouvement de base et elle est devenue maitenant une philosophie utilisee pour une meilleure gestion dans la realisation de ses objectifs organisationnels. Le concept est cependant toujours inaccoutume a des pays comme le Pakistan qui sont submerges par l'ignorance et la myopie des affaires.L'article decouvre l'ampleur dans laquelle les secteurs comme les Armees pakistanaise et l'enseignement connaissent la religiosite et la spiritualite en milieu de travail. Pour cela, des individus ont ete choisis parmi des groupes d'âge et de position differents et une methodologie de l'etude de cas a ete mise en œuvre. L'etude conclut que les deux secteurs ont plus ou moins d'experience de la spiritualite et de la religiosite dans une certaine mesure, mais en meme temps, elle ne peut pas identifier aucune organisation ou la spiritualite en milieu de travail est suivie litterallement ou spirituellement.Mots-cles: religion; spiritualite en milieu de travail
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".