Rheological Properties of Dough and Quality of Salted Noodles Supplemented with Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) Flour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) has attracted attention worldwide for its nutritional value and health benefit. To examine the potential application of djulis flour in oriental starch-based staple products, we supplemented wheat flour with djulis flour in different proportions to investigate the rheological properties of dough and determine the sensory and textural profile of salted noodles. For dough characteristics measured by farinography and extensography, increased amount of djulis flour decreased the departure time, stability, arrival time and extensibility of dough, but increased the maximum resistance to extension. The cooking loss and hardness of salted noodles increased with increased amount of djulis flour. However, the overall sensory acceptability did not differ between salted noodles with djulis flour and controls (p < 0.05). In conclusion, djulis flour could be proportional incorporated into wheat flour and have a positive influence on salted noodle sensory quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".