MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of a maldistribution of microvascular blood flow on capillary O<sub>2</sub> extraction in sepsis

2002· article· en· W1836591545 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher G. Ellis, Ryon M. Bateman, Michael D. Sharpe, William J. Sibbald, Ravi Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisBlood flowMicrocirculationCapillary actionSkeletal muscleBlood capillaryChemistryPerforationInternal medicineLigationEndocrinologyMedicineCardiologyAnatomyAnesthesiaCirculatory systemMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inherent in the remote organ injury caused by sepsis is a profound maldistribution of microvascular blood flow. Using a 24-h rat cecal ligation and perforation model of sepsis, we studied O(2) transport in individual capillaries of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) skeletal muscle. We hypothesized that erythrocyte O(2) saturation (SO(2)) levels within normally flowing capillaries would provide evidence of either a mitochondrial failure (increased SO(2)) or an O(2) transport derangement (decreased SO(2)). Using a spectrophotometric functional imaging system, we found that sepsis caused 1) an increase in stopped flow capillaries (from 10 to 38%, P < 0.05), 2) an increase in the proportion of fast-flow to normal-flow capillaries (P < 0.05), and 3) a decrease in capillary venular-end SO(2) levels from 58.4 +/- 20.0 to 38.5 +/- 21.2%, whereas capillary arteriolar-end SO(2) levels remained unchanged compared with the sham group. Capillary O(2) extraction increased threefold (P < 0.05) and was directly related to the degree of stopped flow in the EDL. Thus impaired O(2) transport in early stage sepsis is likely the result of a microcirculatory dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations273
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207