Experimental determination of dietary carbon turnover in bovine hair and hoof
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stable isotopes measured in keratinized tissues like hair or hoof have proven to be a useful tool for reconstructing the dietary history of animals with a weekly to daily resolution. Quantitative reconstruction of dietary preferences requires a precise estimate of tissue turnover by means of controlled feeding experiments. We determined the turnover rates of carbon in hoof and tail hair of growing steers ( Bos taurus L., 1758) fed a C 3 -based diet, followed by a C 4 -based diet, for 168 d. As with horses, turnover in steer hair was successfully described by a three-pool modelling approach, with apparent half-lives of 1.7, 7.7, and 69.1 d for each of the pools, each contributing 53%, 20%, and 28% of the total signal, respectively. Two pools only were identified in bovine hoof, which recorded the diet switch more slowly than hair with a reduction in the amplitude of short-term isotope changes. We interpreted this result as a sampling artefact and found that the hooves reflected the same pools as the hair if growth geometry is taken into account. The model parameters defined in this study allowed us to quantitatively reconstruct previous diets of steers of different breeds and individual history with a precision of ±1‰.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".