Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper probes into the prospect of introducing learner autonomy and teacher autonomy in the context of EFL education. Starting with some basic definitions of autonomy, learner autonomy and teacher autonomy, the paper explores the roles played by both learner and teacher in the process of cultivating autonomy and presents eight practical stages in the integration of learner autonomy and teacher autonomy in order to carry the point of being autonomous in EFL education. Key words : Learner autonomy; Teacher autonomy; EFL education Resume Cet sondes texte de la perspective de l'introduction de l'autonomie des apprenants et de l'autonomie des enseignants dans le contexte de l'education d’EFL. En commencant par quelques definitions de base de l'autonomie autonomie de l'apprenant, et l'autonomie des enseignants, le document examine le role joue par des apprenants et des enseignants dans le processus de cultiver l'autonomie et presente huit etapes pratiques dans l'integration de l'autonomie des apprenants et de l'autonomie des enseignants en vue de porter le point d'etre autonome dans l'education EFL. Mots cles : Autonomie de l'apprenant; Autonomie des enseignants; Education d’EFL
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".