Perspectivas conceituais sobre o multiculturalismo e a educação multicultural: uma investigação do campo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A nocao de multiculturalismo e politicas multiculturais em suas varias articulacoestem sido de grande importância para a elaboracao e implementacao de politicaseducacionais, curriculo e educacao de professores no Canada. Este artigo investigaperspectivas conceituais com as quais os docentes e profissionais engajadosem pesquisa educacional buscam entender as dinâmicas das politicas de multiculturalismo.Estas perspectivas incluem (mas nao estao limitadas a): perspectivasde multiculturalismo conservador, multiculturalismo liberal e liberal de esquerda,multiculturalismo critico, educacao antirracismo e educacao antiopressao. Elas naorepresentam a totalidade das possibilidades de perspectivas utilizadas pelos docentese profissionais da area. Alem disso, nao sao monoliticas e/ou consensuais,uma vez que existem debates internos e intrinsecos a elas que exigem esforcos deinvestigacao sobre o tema.Palavras-chave: Multiculturalismo. Perspectivas conceituais. Multiculturalismo critico.Educacao antirracismo. Educacao antiopressao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".