Older adolescents with cerebral palsy perceived success to mean being happy, believing in themselves, and being believed in and accepted by others
Bibliographic record
Abstract
King GA, Cathers T, Polgar JM, et al. Success in life for older adolescents with cerebral palsy. Qual Health Res2000 Nov; 10 : 734 –49 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTIONS: How do older adolescents with cerebral palsy who are at the transition stage to adult life define success? What are the factors related to success? Exploratory qualitative study. Southwestern Ontario, Canada. 10 adolescents with cerebral palsy aged 18–20 years (mean age 19 y, 70% women). 5 adolescents were nearing the end of high school, 2 had recently graduated, and 3 had just begun university or college. 2 adolescents were non-ambulatory. Participants had to have the cognitive and communicative ability to understand abstract questions and articulate thoughts. 2 hour semistructured interviews were held with each participant. Questions were designed to obtain the participant's view of the meaning of success in life and the factors that helped or hindered success. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded according … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DQualitative%2BHealth%2BResearch%26rft.stitle%253DQual%2BHealth%2BRes%26rft.aulast%253DKing%26rft.auinit1%253DG.%2BA.%26rft.volume%253D10%26rft.issue%253D6%26rft.spage%253D734%26rft.epage%253D749%26rft.atitle%253DSuccess%2Bin%2BLife%2Bfor%2BOlder%2BAdolescents%2Bwith%2BCerebral%2BPalsy%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1177%252F104973200129118796%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11146856%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/104973200129118796&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11146856&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F4%2F4%2F124.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089866900003&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".