MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841552085 · doi:10.1139/b11-062

Root connections can trigger physiological responses to defoliation in nondefoliated aspen suckers

2011· article· en· W1841552085 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsSuckerBiologyPhotosynthesisStomatal conductanceBotanyWoody plantRoot systemHorticultureAgronomyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In species such as aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.), trees are interconnected through their root system owing to their regeneration mode by root suckering. These root connections challenge classic notions of forest dynamics that consider trees as individuals competing for resources, because root connections allow trees to share water, minerals, and carbohydrates. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that trees can directly influence the physiology of other nearby trees through root connections. In the summers of 2007 and 2008, pairs of aspen suckers (i.e., two suckers connected by a parental root) were selected and divided into three height classes and compared with each other (dominant, codominant, suppressed). Suckers distally positioned on the parental root were manually defoliated, and the effects of defoliation on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and specific leaf area (SLA) were measured on connected but nondefoliated suckers. Results showed that defoliation caused physiological responses in the interconnected trees in summer 2007, which was drier than summer 2008. Defoliation of a connected sucker had a greater effect on suppressed suckers, for which mean photosynthesis rate increased by 17% compared with that of controls. The effect was less important for codominant (14% increase) and dominant (12%) trees. SLA of suppressed suckers also increased, while the increase in SLA values was smaller for codominant and dominant suckers. In summer 2008, no defoliation effect was observed, probably owing to high moisture conditions that resulted in much higher stomatal conductance values compared with those in 2007 (+55%). Under high humidity conditions, leaf specific hydraulic conductance does not constrain stomatal conductance, so the rate of CO 2 assimilation was probably at its maximum capacity. This study demonstrated that trees could physiologically interact through root connections, and these interactions should thus be considered in studies of stand dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it