Psychosocial Outcomes following Electroconvulsive Therapy in a Community Setting: Retrospective Chart Review with 2-Year Follow-up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) continues to be one of the most effective biological therapies for patients with mood disorders. Numerous studies address clinical response; however, few have examined psychosocial or occupational outcomes following ECT, especially in community settings. This study aimed to examine these outcomes in short- and long-term naturalistic follow-up of ECT conducted in a community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who received ECT at Ridge Meadows Hospital in Maple Ridge, British Columbia, between January 1997 and December 2003. Charts were evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Global Assessment of Functioning, and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scales prior to ECT and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-ECT. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with mood disorders underwent ECT; 86.5% were rated on the CGI as "markedly ill" to "among the most extremely ill" at baseline. All clinical ratings improved at every follow-up point, and by the end of 24 months, 56.6% of patients were rated as "much improved" or "very much improved" on the CGI. Similarly, the measures of psychosocial functioning also showed significant improvement throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that substantial and meaningful improvement occurred in clinical and psychosocial outcomes after ECT conducted in a community hospital. These changes were robust and stable over the 2-year follow-up period. Limitations of the study include the retrospective ratings, the open-label use of ECT, and the naturalistic treatment in follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".