Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the long history of western literature there has long been a tradition of folly literature. I. B. Singer ,a distinguished contemporary Jewish writer ,fabricated a series of typical literature figures called fools in yiddish ,who are thought to be the original Jewish figures. One example is Gimple the Fool .By analyzing the “fool” in this article, we can see that Singer is always longing for the peaceful humanitarianism. Key words: I.B.Singer,fool, implication, the peaceful humanitarianism Resume Dans la litterature occidentale existe une longue tradition de la « litterature des imbeciles ». I.B. Singer, celebre ecrivain juif contemporain des Etats-Unis, a cree une serie d’ images imbeciles litteraires qui sont vues comme les modeles de la nation juive, et dont L’Imbecile Gimple est considere comme le chef-d’oeuvre. En analysant l’image imbecile de cet ouvrage, l’article traite l’humanitarisme pacifique de Singer. Mots cles : I.B.Singer, l’imbecile, la signification, l’humanitarisme pacifique 摘 要 在西方文學中有一個源遠流長的“愚人文學”傳統。當代美國著名猶太作家辛格以垂死的猶太民族語言意第緒語,創造出了一系列被西方人認為是猶太民族原型的文學典型——愚者形象，《傻瓜吉姆佩爾》可謂其代表作。通過分析本文中的“傻瓜”形象，探討辛格的和平人道主義理想.。 關鍵詞： 辛格；傻瓜；意蘊；和平的人道主義
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".