MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1842444622 · doi:10.1002/jnm.2100

Efficient modeling of GaN HEMTs for linear and nonlinear circuits design

2015· article· en· W1842444622 on OpenAlexaff
Anwar Jarndal, Ammar B. Kouki

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersUniversität Kassel
KeywordsHigh-electron-mobility transistorAmplifierTransistorGallium nitrideNonlinear systemSubstrate (aquarium)Electronic engineeringSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic circuitLarge-signal modelMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringNanotechnologyVoltageLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a nonlinear modeling approach for gallium nitride high‐electron mobility transistor (GaN HEMT) on Si substrate is proposed. A reliable method has been developed to extract the extrinsic elements of the model. Its main advantage is its accuracy and dependency on only pinched‐off and unbiased S‐parameter measurements. The extrinsic elements are de‐embedded from multi‐bias S‐parameters to characterize the transistor intrinsic and construct a large‐signal model. The validity of the developed modeling approach is verified by comparing its small‐signal and large‐signal (single‐tone and two‐tone) simulations with measured data of a 2‐mm GaN HEMT on Si substrate. The model has been employed for designing a class‐AB power amplifier. A very good agreement between the amplifier simulation and measurement shows the validity of the model. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and FieldsSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207