Building New Socialist Countryside with a Harmonious Combination Production, Living and Ecosystem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on a great deal of practice in the planning of the Chinese countryside landscape and sight-seeing agriculture, the author proposes the planning concept of new countryside. That is building new socialist countryside in the real sense and realizing the aim of constructing socialist harmonious society by combining production, living and ecosystem and maintaining the flavor of the countryside as far as possible. Key words: new countryside, countryside of China, landscape planning, harmonious society Resume: Sur la base de la pratique massive de planification du paysage rural et de l’agricuture touristique, l’auteur propose l’idee de nouveau ruralisme. En assurant la condition prealable de construire la « triple harmonie »(harmonie entre la production, la vie et l’ecologie) et maintenir le « ruralisme » de la campagne, on va construire la nouvelle campagne socialiste authentique et realiser l’objectif de l’edification de la societe harmonieuse socialiste. Mots-cles: nouveau ruralisme, campagne chinoise, planification du paysage, societe harmonieuse 摘要：作者在大量的中國鄉村景觀和觀光農業規劃實踐基礎上，提出了新鄉村主義規劃理念，在建設“三生和諧＂（即生產、生活、生態相和諧）和儘量保持農村“鄉村性＂的前提下，建設真正意義上的社會主義新農村，實現構建社會主義和諧社會的目標。 關鍵詞：新鄉村主義；中國鄉村；景觀規劃；和諧社會
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".