Aortic valve stenosis is associated with reduced myocardial perfusion as assessed by videodensitometry in coronary angiograms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Aortic valve stenosis may be accompanied by angina despite coronary arteries free of significant stenosis due to microvascular abnormalities. AIMS: The aim of the current study was to test whether densitometry-derived myocardial perfusion on coronary angiogram is reduced in patients with aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: The study comprised 20 patients with aortic valve stenosis (mean transvalvular gradient: 47.4±15.2 mm Hg) and 30 control subjects without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. A quantitative parameter of myocardial perfusion was calculated by the ratio of maximal density (Gmax) and time to reach maximum density (Tmax) on time-density curves in regions of interest of each coronary artery on coronary angiograms. RESULTS: Mean three-vessel Gmax/Tmax proved to be significantly lower in patients with aortic valve stenosis compared to control subjects (2.55±1.02 1/sec vs. 3.39±1.09 1/sec, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced Gmax/Tmax values indicative of myocardial perfusion abnormalities as measured by densitometry on coronary angiograms could be demonstrated in patients with aortic valve stenosis compared to controls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it