MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1843562888 · doi:10.1111/cid.12193

Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3<scp>D</scp> Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability

2013· article· en· W1843562888 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lars Sennerby, Peter Andersson, Luca Pagliani, Claudio Giani, Giacomo Moretti, Massimo Molinari, Alessandro Motroni

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHounsfield scaleCone beam computed tomographyScannerImplantResonance frequency analysisBone densityMedicineNuclear medicineComputed tomographyDental implantBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceRadiologySurgeryOsteoporosisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bone density examination (BDE) using preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) might be used to predict primary implant stability in implant patients. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to validate a novel CBCT scanner in vitro with regard to BDE in preoperative scans and to analyze the in vivo correlation of CBCT scan results with primary implant stability measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CBCT scanner was validated in vitro with regard to spatial uniformity and linearity of CT numbers (Hounsfield units, HU) by using a series of phantoms and plastic and hydroxyapatite specimens of various densities. Forty-nine patients (27 female and 22 male, mean age 55.6 ± 9.8) were scanned prior to and 1 to 6 months after the placement of 155 dental implants of different lengths and diameters. Mean and peak insertion torque (IT) in Ncm were registered during implant placement. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements in ISQ units were performed after placement. The second scan was used to export and superimpose the exact positions of bone and implants into the first scan. Virtual probes with the same length as the actual implant were automatically placed at the implant sites, and mean HU values were measured in a 1 mm-wide circular corridor from the tip of the threads and out. RESULTS: The in vitro validation showed high uniformity and linearity of CT numbers (HU). The clinical study showed significant correlations between bone density and ISQ, mean IT, and peak IT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The WhiteFox CBCT scanner measures bone density with high accuracy. There is a correlation between bone density and primary implant stability as assessed with IT and RFA measurements. The findings suggest that BDE may be used as an additional feature in treatment-planning software to estimate primary stability at predetermined implant sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research→Same topicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→