Bibliographic record
Abstract
‘Relativity' is recognised for its cinematic investigation of point of view in short narrative film and acknowledged for its exploration of the related questions of reality and the perception of reality, truth and the perception of truth, sex and the perception of sex. Written and directed by Heath and edited by Steve Sprung (Sprung, 2), Relativity investigates the cinematic devices and editing strategies that enable the audience to perceive one contentious ‘family’ incident from three different points of view. This has been acknowledged by a leading producer and teacher, Carl Schoenfeld, who has used Relativity as exemplary material for students around the world engaging with the problems of representing point of view in cinema. 'Relativity' won the prize for 'Best Short Film' at the Berlin International Film Festival, 2002. It was nominated for the European Film Academy Awards and won the 'Best Film' and 'Kodak' prizes in the New Zealand Drifting Clouds Film Festival 16 March, 2002 (Jury included Jamie Selkirk, producer 'Lord of the Rings', Michael Seresin, Cinematographer 'Angela's Ashes', 'Harry Potter'). The success of 'Relativity' in Drifting Clouds and other festivals provided funding for the subsequent film, Point Annihilation. Also shown at International Film Festivals: St. Petersburg International Film Festival, (2002); Norwegian Short Film Festival (2002); Abbeville Film Festival, France (2002); 6th Hildesheimer Kurzfilmfest, (2002); Montecatini International Film Festival (2002); Flanders International Film Festival, (2002); Drama International Film Festival, Greece (2002); Cinema Tout Ecran, Geneva, (British Council Tour) (2002); Atlantic International Film Festival, Canada, (2002); Cleveland International Film Festival, USA (2003); Los Angeles International Short Film Festival, (2002); Brief Encounters Short Film Festival, (2004); Tampere International Film Festival, 2005 Retrospective showcase of the Best of British Short Films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".