Bibliographic record
Abstract
‘Relativity' is recognised for its cinematic investigation of point of view in short narrative film and acknowledged for its exploration of the related questions of reality and the perception of reality, truth and the perception of truth, sex and the perception of sex.<p></p> \n \nWritten and directed by Heath and edited by Steve Sprung (Sprung, 2), Relativity investigates the cinematic devices and editing strategies that enable the audience to perceive one contentious ‘family’ incident from three different points of view. This has been acknowledged by a leading producer and teacher, Carl Schoenfeld, who has used Relativity as exemplary material for students around the world engaging with the problems of representing point of view in cinema.<p></p> \n \n'Relativity' won the prize for 'Best Short Film' at the Berlin International Film Festival, 2002. It was nominated for the European Film Academy Awards and won the 'Best Film' and 'Kodak' prizes in the New Zealand Drifting Clouds Film Festival 16 March, 2002 (Jury included Jamie Selkirk, producer 'Lord of the Rings', Michael Seresin, Cinematographer 'Angela's Ashes', 'Harry Potter').<p></p> \n \nThe success of 'Relativity' in Drifting Clouds and other festivals provided funding for the subsequent film, "Point Annihilation".<p></p> \n \nAlso shown at International Film Festivals: \nSt. Petersburg International Film Festival, (2002); \nNorwegian Short Film Festival (2002); \nAbbeville Film Festival, France (2002); \n6th Hildesheimer Kurzfilmfest, (2002); \nMontecatini International Film Festival (2002); \nFlanders International Film Festival, (2002); \nDrama International Film Festival, Greece (2002); \n"Cinema Tout Ecran", Geneva, (British Council Tour) (2002); \nAtlantic International Film Festival, Canada, (2002); \nCleveland International Film Festival, USA (2003); \nLos Angeles International Short Film Festival, (2002); \nBrief Encounters Short Film Festival, (2004); \nTampere International Film Festival, 2005 Retrospective showcase of the "Best of British Short Films".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".