Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery. 25.: Perioperative chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Question: Does perioperative adjuvant therapy improve the outcome of operable gastric cancer? Design: Multicentre randomized controlled trial. Setting: Forty-five centres in the United Kingdom as well as centres in the Netherlands, Germany, Brazil, Singapore and New Zealand. Patients: Five hundred and three patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophogastric junction or lower esophagus were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (n = 250 patients) or surgery alone (n = 253 patients). Interventions: Patients who were assigned to the perioperative chemotherapy and surgery group received 3 doses of chemotherapy (epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil) preoperatively, followed by surgery 3–6 weeks after the third dose, and then 3 doses of postoperative chemotherapy beginning 6–12 weeks after surgery. Patients assigned to surgery alone were scheduled to have surgery within 6 weeks of randomization. The main outcome measure was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, assessments of downstaging, the surgeon's assessment of whether the surgery was curative and quality of life. Results: Rates of postoperative complications were similar in both groups (46% v. 45%, respectively), as were the numbers of deaths within 30 days of surgery. The resected tumours were significantly smaller and less advanced in the group that received perioperative chemotherapy. With a mean follow-up of 4 years, 144 (60%) of the patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 170 (67%) of the patients in the surgery group died. The likelihood of overall survival was higher in the perioperative chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] for death 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.93; p = 0.009; 5-year survival rate 36% v. 23%), as was the likelihood of progression-free survival (HR for progression 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.81; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared with the group receiving surgery alone, overall survival improved in the group receiving perioperative chemotherapy, as did progression-free survival among patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophogastric junction or lower esophagus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".