MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1846253733 · doi:10.14288/1.0077085

Evaluation of exercise tolerance in women receiving surgery and chemotherapy as treatment for stage II breast cancer

2009· book· en· W1846253733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa Dawn Wiley

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerStage (stratigraphy)MedicineChemotherapyOncologyInternal medicineCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Worldwide, breast cancer is the second-most-common cause of cancer deaths in women (Harvey and Beattie, 1996). It is estimated that by the year 2000, one million women a year will receive a diagnosis of breast cancer, while in Canada alone, the disease develops in 18,400 women every year (National Cancer Institute of Canada, 1997). The development and improvement of new treatment modalities for breast cancer have resulted in increasing cure rates and longer disease-free survival making the outcome of cancer therapy increasingly important. Damaging effects of cancer therapies can occur in the heart and lungs and therefore are thought to impede the patient's functional capacity and ability to exercise. The purpose of this study was to characterize the early changes in functional capacity that occur in women diagnosed with stage II breast cancer, whose treatment involves a schedule of mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine female patients performed the treatment protocol at three different sessions: 1) after diagnosis of breast cancer but before surgery, 2) following surgery but before beginning chemotherapy, and 3) following chemotherapy. Testing sessions involved two protocols and the subjects served as their own controls throughout the three tests. Firstly, resting pulmonary function was assessed using the Spirometry software package on the Medical Graphics CPX-D Metabolic Cart. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the ratio of the two (FEV1/FVC), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were measured. The second protocol was a V0₂max test on an electronically-braked cycle ergometer (Lode BV Excalibur V2.0) using a Medical Graphics CPX-D Exercise Testing System. Measurements included maximal heart rate (HRmax), minute ventilation (VE), maximal oxygen consumption (V02max), and peak power output (PPO). While cycling, percent arterial oxygen saturation (%Sa02) was monitored with a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda Box 3740). Anthropometric measures including height, weight and sum of skinfolds (SOS) were recorded before each test. Data was analyzed using a one-way repeated measures A N O V A design on SPSS and subsequent Tukey HSD post-hoc analyses were performed by hand. A probability value of < 0.05 was considered to provide significance. V 0 2 m a x values, measured both in L/min and ml/kg/min decreased significantly from baseline to the end of chemotherapy (1.70 ± 0.31 to 1.47 ± 0.31 L/min; and 28.3 ± 5.54 to 24.52 ± 6 . 1 3 ml/kg/min, respectively). FEV1/FVC and M V V did not change significantly throughout the treatment. PPO, HRm a x , Sa02 , and V E also remained unchanged after chemotherapy treatment. Although respiratory function was not affected, the data suggests that breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy experience a decrease in cardiorespiratory fitness and associated loss of functional capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→