Promotion of Hinduism in Children through Cartoons in Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is an effort to explore the promotion of Hinduism in children through cartoons in Pakistan which are based on Hindu religious topics and dub in Hindi language. Objective of the study is to probe the planned agenda of Indian media and to aware parents about the harmful effects of such productions. Social Cognitive theory is used, the methodology is survey method and questionnaire is used as tool of data collection. Sample drawn for the study is 200 of which 100 are children and 100 are parents. The results of the study reveal that children are quick learner and they copy the same which they observe in cartoons such as words of Hindi language hence, Indian cultural and religious values have started to evolve rapidly in Pakistani culture. Key words : Indian & Pakistani culture, Cartoon effects, Hindi Religion & language, Social learning behavior. Resume Cette etude est un effort pour explorer la promotion de l’hindouisme chez les enfants a travers le dessin au Pakistan, qui sont fondes sur des themes religieux hindous et dub dans la langue hindi. Objectif de l’etude est de sonder l’ordre du jour prevu de medias indiens et a sensibiliser les parents sur les effets nocifs de ces productions. La theorie sociale cognitive est utilisee, la methode est la methode d’enquete et le questionnaire est utilise comme outil de collecte de donnees. Echantillon tire de l’etude est de 200 dont 100 sont des enfants et 100 sont des parents. Les resultats de l’etude revelent que les enfants sont apprend vite et ils copient les memes qu’ils observent dans les dessins animes tels que les mots de la langue hindi par consequent, les valeurs culturelles et religieuses indiennes ont commence a evoluer rapidement dans la culture pakistanaise. Mots cles : Culture indienne et pakistanaise, Effets de bande dessinee, La religion Hindi et la langue, Le comportement de l’apprentissage social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".