Radiation-induced formation of Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles from Co<sup>2+</sup>(aq): probing the kinetics using radical scavengers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of the Co(2+) content and different radical scavengers on the kinetics of γ-radiation-induced Co3O4 nanoparticle formation and growth were investigated. There are four distinct stages of particle formation with different oxidation rates. Scavengers and [Co(2+)]0 affect the oxidation kinetics in the different stages and consequently the final size of the particles formed. Radiolysis model calculations were performed to obtain the time-evolution of the concentrations of key oxidants and reductants, and the effect of scavengers on those concentrations. Based on the model results and experimental data a reaction mechanism for Co3O4 particle formation by γ-irradiation of solutions containing Co(2+)(aq) is proposed. The main cobalt oxidation reaction changes with time. Oxidation of Co(2+)(aq) to Co(3+)(aq) by radiolytically produced ˙OH occurs first in the solution phase. This is followed by spontaneous co-precipitation of mixed Co(II)/Co(III) hydroxide nucleate particles. Adsorption of Co(II)(ad) followed by surface oxidation of Co(II)(ad) to CoOOH(ad) by H2O2 grows particles with a solid CoOOH(s) phase. In parallel, the solid-state transformation of CoOOH(s) and Co(II)(ad) to form Co3O4(s) occurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".