Luminescent gelatin nanospheres by encapsulating CdSe quantum dots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) have been encapsulated within gelatin nanoparticles (GNPs), which gives GNPs fluorescent properties and improves the biocompatibility of QDs. Hydrophilic CdSe QDs were produced through thermodecomposition following the ligand-exchange method, and were then encapsulated in GNPs. The results of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy show that CdSe QDs and QDs-encapsulated GNPs (QDs-GNPs) have average diameters of 5 ± 1 and 150 ± 10 nm, respectively. Results of both high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy indicate that CdSe QDs are successfully encapsulated within GNPs. The QDs-GNPs have distinctive fluorescent properties with maximum emission at 654 nm, with a 24 nm red-shift compared with hydrophilic mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA)-modified QDs. In addition, an in vitro cytotoxicity test shows that QDs-GNPs do not have any toxic effect on cells. It is expected that QDs-GNPs might be an excellent candidate as a contrast agent in bio-imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it