Antibiotics versus control for toxoplasma retinochoroiditis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute toxoplasma retinochoroiditis causes transient symptoms of ocular discomfort and may lead to permanent visual loss. Antibiotic treatment primarily aims to reduce the risk of permanent visual loss, recurrent retinochoroiditis, and the severity and duration of acute symptoms. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare the effects of antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment for toxoplasma retinochoroiditis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL/CCTR, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Specialised Register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2001), EMBASE (1980 to September 2001), Dissertation Abstracts (1861 to June 2001), LILACS (1982 to 1998), Pascal (1984 to March 2000), proceedings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (1980 to 2001), international symposia on uveitis, and reference lists of review articles. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted for unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared any systemic antibiotic treatment against placebo or no treatment. Trials that included immunocompromised patients were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcomes for this review were visual acuity at least three months after treatment and risk of recurrent retinochoroiditis. Secondary outcomes were improvement in symptoms and signs of intraocular inflammation, size of lesion and adverse events. Effect measures were pooled using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials, which randomised a total of 173 participants, met the inclusion criteria. All trials were methodologically poor. None reported the effect of treatment on visual acuity. Two studies reported results for recurrent retinochoroiditis: one (124 participants) found a significant reduction in participants with chronic recurrent disease who were treated for 14 months: relative risk 0.28 (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.78); the other (20 participants) found no evidence of an effect in participants with acute toxoplasma retinochoroiditis (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 13.87). Two studies reported an improvement in intraocular inflammation in treated compared with untreated participants and one study reported no difference. Two studies found an increased risk of adverse events in treated participants. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to support routine antibiotic treatment for acute toxoplasma retinochoroiditis. There is weak evidence to suggest that long-term treatment of patients with chronic recurrent toxoplasma retinochoroiditis may reduce recurrence. Placebo controlled trials of patients with acute and chronic toxoplasma retinochoroiditis affecting any part of the retina are required to determine the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".