MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomized phase II trial of a new anticoagulant, apixaban, in metastatic cancer

2009· article· en· W1847026520 on OpenAlexaff
Mark N. Levine, David Deitchman, J. Julian, Howard A. Liebman, Carmelita P. Escalante, Mary Claire O’Brien, Luz M. Ramirez, Lorraine Weise-Kelly, Susan Solymoss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)Montreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApixabanInternal medicineCancerPopulationAdverse effectSurgeryRandomized controlled trialVitamin K antagonistWarfarinOncologyRivaroxaban

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e20514 Background: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, biologic, and molecular targeted therapies are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Currently available anticoagulants (ACs) are not well suited to prevent VTE in such patients. Vitamin K antagonist oral ACs require frequent lab monitoring and low molecular weight heparins require daily subcutaneous injection. There is concern for bleeding with ACs. Apixaban (A) is a new antithrombotic agent which inhibits activated coagulation Factor X, is taken orally, and does not require lab monitoring. Trials to prevent post-operative VTE in orthopedic surgery showed that A was effective and safe. We wanted to assess the feasibility of A in cancer. Methods: In a randomized phase II trial, patients with metastatic cancer on 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy received study drug once daily for 12 weeks; either 5, 10 or 20 mg of A, or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients remaining free of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), VTE, and grade ≥3 adverse events considered to be probably/definitely related to study drug (AE*). After 125 patients were recruited, the sponsor eliminated further randomization to the 10 and 20 mg arms, to add experience with the 5 mg dose currently under evaluation for VTE prevention in other conditions. Data on the first 125 patients are reported. Results: The study population was 50% male; 88% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. The most common cancers were breast, colon, pancreas, and myeloma. 23% had liver metastases. Approximately 80% of A patients completed 12 weeks of treatment. The numbers of patients with events were: Conclusions: Apixiban was well tolerated in patients with advanced cancer on chemotherapy. Major bleeding, thrombosis, and drug-related SAEs were very low. These results support further study of A in phase III trials for VTE prevention in cancer patients. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.602
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207