MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848040503 · doi:10.1190/geo2015-0044.1

Fast simultaneous seismic source separation using Stolt migration and demigration operators

2015· article· en· W1848040503 on OpenAlexafffund
Amr Ibrahim, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFourier transformRadon transformAlgorithmComputer scienceOperator (biology)Source separationInverseInterference (communication)MathematicsMathematical analysisComputer visionGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Stolt migration is a Fourier-domain imaging operator that assumes a constant-velocity media. We have developed a multivelocity version of the Stolt migration and demigration operators to derive a transform that can decompose seismic data into a sparse collection of coefficients in the image space. This Stolt-based transform is similar to the apex-shifted hyperbolic Radon transform (ASHRT). However, the Stolt-based transform is considerably faster than the classical ASHRT because it uses two fast operators (forward and inverse fast Fourier transforms) to estimate the data coefficients in the image space. We used this Stolt-based transform as a tool for simultaneous seismic source separation by removing erratic interference noise in common receiver gathers. Estimating the coefficients of interference-free seismic data using the Stolt-based transform was posed as an inverse problem. The solution of this inverse problem was found by minimizing a cost function that included a sparsity-promoting regularization term. In addition, the cost function incorporated a robust misfit function that was not sensitive to erratic interferences. Our tests on synthetic and field data examples determined that this new transform can efficiently remove interference noise and achieve fast simultaneous seismic source separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207