Extended blood grouping of blood donors with automatable PCR‐ELISA genotyping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the past 10 years, PCR-based methods have been described to allow the detection of gene polymorphisms responsible for many blood group antigens. These methods are routinely used to test samples of fetal origin and to resolve serologic discrepancies. Another interesting application of blood group genotyping could be the extended typing of blood donors for minor antigens to facilitate the procurement of compatible blood for alloimmunized patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCR-based tests have been modified to allow multiplex amplification of specific fragments of blood group genes and the convenient detection of hybridized amplicons by ELISA in a microplate format. RESULTS: The results obtained show that fragments of the Rh (D, c, C, e, E), Kell (K, k), Duffy (Fya, Fyb), and Kidd (Jka, Jkb) genes could be amplified along with controls in multiplex PCR reactions. Labeling of amplicons with digoxigenin allowed their solid-phase detection in microplate wells previously coated with individual blood group-specific oligonucleotides. A comparative study performed with 100 individuals showed a 99.7 percent concordance between genotypes and phenotypes for the 11 antigens assayed, with only three discrepant Fyb genotypes. CONCLUSION: Extended genotyping could be performed once on regular donors and confirmed when needed by standard serologic RBC assays. The format of these tests will allow easy automation of the procedure including the interpretation and downloading of the results with existing ELISA software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".