MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New candidate targets of protein phosphatase-1c-gamma-2 in mouse testis revealed by a differential phosphoproteome analysis

2010· article· en· W1848728100 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Henderson, Graham MacLeod, Christopher Hrabchak, Susannah Varmuza

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Andrology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphataseBiologyDephosphorylationPhosphorylationSpermatogenesisGene isoformProteomicsMutantCell biologySerineMolecular biologyGeneGeneticsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reversible phosphorylation has been implicated in many developmental processes. Dephosphorylation is mediated by several families of phosphatases, including type 1 serine/threonine phosphatases (protein phosphatase-1 or PP1). The loss of the murine Ppp1cc gene causes male infertility as a result of impaired spermatogenesis. Ppp1cc encodes two splice isoforms, PPP1CC1 and PPP1CC2, with the latter being the most abundant isoform in the testis. However, the details of PPP1CC2's involvement in spermatogenesis are still unknown. As a phosphatase has been removed from the mutant mouse, a search for hyperphosphorylated proteins in the mutant testis may reveal the direct downstream targets of PPP1CC2. Using a whole tissue proteomics approach to identify testis-specific dephosphorylation targets of PPP1CC2, we found that two-dimensional electrophoresis identified 10 potential targets in the Ppp1cc null testis several of which are factors known to be important for spermatogenesis, such as HSPA2. Another potential target, tubulin, was found to be misregulated during Ppp1cc(-/-) spermatogenesis, disrupting manchette development. This work represents the first survey of the testicular phosphoproteome under pathological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AndrologySame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207