MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W184891198 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a474-c

Cardiovascular Depressor Responses to Stimulation of the Parasubthalamic Nucleus

2007· article· en· W184891198 on OpenAlexaffabout
John Ciriello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBradycardiaStimulationHeart rateAtropineMedicineAnesthesiaInternal medicineChemistryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The parasubthamalic nucleus (PSTN) has been shown to have extensive connections to the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). However, the function of PSTN in cardiovascular regulation is unknown. Experiments were done in alpha‐chloralose anesthetized, paralyzed and artificially ventilated rats to investigate the effect of glutamate (Glu; 10 nl, 0.25M) stimulation of PSTN on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Glu stimulation elicited depressor (−22±3 mmHg) and bradycardia (−31±5 bpm) responses. Administration (iv) of atropine methyl bromide attenuated the bradycardia response (−17±7 bpm), but had no effect on the MAP response (−19±5 mmHg). Subsequent iv administration of hexamethonium bromide blocked both the remaining bradycardia and depressor responses. Ipsilateral microinjection of the synaptic blocker CoCl 2 (100 nl) into the caudal NTS region attenuated (60–72%) the depressor and bradycardia responses. These data indicate that activation of PSTN neurons elicit a decrease in MAP due to sympathoinhibition, while the cardiac slowing involves both sympathoinhibition and vagal excitation. In addition, these data suggest that the PSTN depressor effects on the circulation are mediated in part through a connection involving the NTS. Supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→