Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is an attempt to scrutinize the Lyotardian concept of metanarrative in Peter Ackroyd’s Chatterton. Metanarrative seeks to legitimize itself as the only ideology showing the way of Truth, neglects the other narratives, and functions violently to suppress and control the individual subject disregarding individual or cultural differences. Ironically while attempting to give the solution for the human problems and bringing emancipation and salvation through its one dimensional ideology; grand narrative neglects excluded beliefs and ideologies by imposing a false sense of totality and universality. Ultimately the study displays that the only way to get away from the autocratic shackles of the fossilized and frozen mono-centric notions is to resist against them, and we all must learn to respect each and every micro-narrative, which is the silenced and suppressed voice of people of different religious, cultural and socio-political strata. Key words : Lyotard; Metanarrative; Mico-narrative; Chatterton; Strata Resume Cette etude est une tentative de scruter le concept du metarecit lyotardienne de Chatterton Peter Ackroyd. Metarecit cherche a se legitimer comme la seule ideologie de montrer la voie de la Verite, neglige les autres recits, et les fonctions violemment a reprimer et controler le sujet individuel sans tenir compte des differences individuelles ou culturelles. Ironiquement tout en essayant de donner la solution pour les problemes humains et apporter l'emancipation et le salut grâce a ses dimensions une ideologie; grand recit neglige les croyances et les ideologies exclus en imposant un faux sentiment de totalite et d'universalite. Finalement l'etude affiche que la seule facon de sortir du carcan autocratique du fossilises et congeles mono-centrique notions est de resister a leur encontre, et nous devons tous apprendre a respecter chaque micro-recit, qui est le silence et reprime la voix des gens de differentes couches religieuses, culturelles et socio-politique. Mots cles: Lyotard; Metarecit; Micro-recit; Chatterton; les strates
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".