MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiwavelength observations of cirrus clouds in the North Celestial Loop: a study of the OH emission

2010· article· en· W1850412270 on OpenAlexafffund
L. Barriault, G. Joncas, Felix J. Lockman, P. G. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversité LavalCentre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAssociated UniversitiesFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsCirrusAstrophysicsExtinction (optical mineralogy)Green Bank TelescopeInfraredMolecular cloudIntensity (physics)Interstellar mediumOptical depthAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AstronomyAtmospheric sciencesGalaxyOpticsStarsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New 1665- and 1667-MHz OH observations were made with the Green Bank Telescope at an angular resolution of 7 arcmin of 108 locations over two diffuse gas clouds at high Galactic latitude. A linear correlation is observed between the IRAS 100 μm infrared intensity, which traces all the gas, and the OH column density, indicating that the amount of OH increases with the visual extinction above a threshold value of AV≈ 0.5. N(OH) increases monotonically with N(H i) in up to N(OH) ≈ 0.25–0.3 × 1014 cm−2. At greater values of N(OH) the H i column density saturates at N(H i) ≈ 5 × 1020 cm−2, suggesting that there is molecular gas not traced by H i. No correlation is found between the 12CO integrated intensity and the OH column density, indicating that OH might be a better tracer of H2 than CO in those diffuse regions. An H i column density of at least ≈2.2–2.9 × 1020 cm−2 is needed for the formation of OH, but in regions where the cloud is less shielded from the interstellar radiation field the value rises to N(H i) = 3.3 × 1020 cm−2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207