Stand and declare: Opportunity and challenge of clinical trial registration.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian Family Physician (CFP) is a URM journal; that is to say, we follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The ICMJE developed in the late 1970s when a small group of medical editors met to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. Over the years, the ICMJE has gradually broadened its scope to include ethical principles related to publication in biomedical journals.1 In 2004, the ICMJE published an editorial aimed at promoting clinical trial registration.2 It announced that ICMJE member journals (11 general medical journals whose editors form the ICMJE) would require, as a consideration for publication, registration of trials in a public trials registry. The ICMJE encouraged editors of other biomedical journals, such as CFP, to adopt a similar policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.502 | 0.685 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.025 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.052 | 0.057 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".