MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W185115784

“The Obscenities of this Country”: Canada v. Bedford and the Reform of Canadian Prostitution Laws

2014· article· en· W185115784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Sampson

Bibliographic record

VenueDuke journal of gender law & policy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownOfficerLawTortureLaw enforcementCriminologyWitnessPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryHuman rights
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In February 2002, following a search for illegal weapons that turned up the belongings of several missing women, the Vancouver Police Department laid charges of first-degree murder against Robert Pickton for the deaths of Sereena Abotsway and Mona Wilson, two Aboriginal women working as street-level prostitutes in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. 3 Over the next three years, Pickton, a pig farmer from Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, would be charged with twenty-four additional murders, making his case the "largest serial killer investigation in Canadian history." 4 There is evidence, however, that Pickton may have committed even more murders -in 2002, he told an undercover officer posing as his cellmate that he "was gonna do one more, make it an even fifty," but was caught before he had the chance because he had become "sloppy." 5At trial, prosecutors demonstrated that Pickton would travel into Vancouver, offer "money and drugs" to women working on the "low track[s]" of the Downtown Eastside, and then bring them back to his pig farm, where he would torture, kill, and dismember them. 6 In the aftermath of the Pickton trial, various media outlets revealed that the Vancouver Police Department had badly mishandled investigations into the over 65 women who had gone missing in Vancouver over the past two decades.In

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuke journal of gender law & policySame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207