MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W18520871

[Folic acid supplementation for pregnant women in Hungary].

2006· article· en· W18520871 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M Bognár, Péter Hauser, Zsuzsa Jakab, Judit Müller, Tamás Constantin, Dezső Schuler, Miklós Garami

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Folic acidNeural tubeFolic acid supplementationNeuroblastomaPediatricsPregnancyCancer registryObstetricsCancerInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Neural tube defects are common major congenital anomalies. Folic acid supplementation has been shown to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects. In 2003, incidence of neuroblastoma has decreased with 60% in Canada as a result of enriched cereal grain flours with synthetic folic acid. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the practice of the folic acid intake by pregnant women (based on the Hungarian recommendation) to the incidence of neural tube defects and neuroblastoma. METHODS: The practice of folic acid supplementation was examined by questionnaires filled according to the documentation of health visitors. The data were worked up by computer. The incidence of neural tube defect was obtained from the data of the Hungarian Congenital Anomalies Registry, however, the data of National Health Insurance Company are also given. The incidence of neuroblastoma was the data of the Hungarian Pediatric Tumor Registry. Regular folic acid intake has been recommended to pregnant women in Hungary, since the eighties of the last century. An official protocol had been released by the Obstetric and Gynecologic Professional Board in 1997. In this paper, the authors report the Hungarian pregnant women's folic acid intake in years of 2001, 2002 and 2003. These years were chosen, because according to the data of the Hungarian Pediatric Cancer Registry 45% of the neuroblastoma cases are less than 1 year old, and 45% of them are 1-5 years old at the time of diagnosis. The authors succeeded to collect the data from 95% of the pregnant women during these years (271,748 women). RESULTS: Based on the statistical analysis of the collected data, 69% of the pregnant women were regularly taking folic acid products in Hungary, however, the dose of the daily intake was below 5 mg. 93% of the pregnant women started the folic acid intake after their 7th weeks of pregnancy The incidence of neural tube defects was constant, and the incidence of neuroblastoma slightly increased during the above mentioned period. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlighted that, the folic acid intake to prevent neural tube defects was started too late, because the formation of neural tube is finished on 28. day of pregnancy. 85% of the pregnant women used less amount of folic acid than 5 mg/day. The increasing number of planned pregnancies would allow to start folic acid intake earlier. However, based on international experience, the enrichment of cereal grain flours with synthetic folic acid could provide optimal results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→