MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1852143016 · doi:10.1139/b2012-097

Monophyly of some North American species of<i>Ramalina</i>and inferred polyketide synthase gene function

2012· article· en· W1852143016 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Brinda A. Timsina, Elfie Stocker‐Wörgötter, Michele D. Piercey‐Normore

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustrian Science FundParks Canada
KeywordsBiologyMonophylyPolyphylyParaphylyBotanyPhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyCladeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ramalina thrausta (Ach.) Nyl., Ramalina roesleri (Hochst. Ex Schaerer) Hue, and Ramalina dilacerata (Hoffm.) Hoffm. are three common North American species that have not been placed in a phylogeny and are sympatric in their distribution leading to uncertainty about monophyly. Species characters include secondary metabolites (polyketides) in Ramalina that may be both hereditary and influenced by environmental conditions, but little is known about the function of polyketide synthase (PKS) genes. The main goal of this study was to examine the monophyly among some of the more common species in northern North America and secondarily to compare potential PKS gene function with the phylogeny. Nucleotide sequences of two genes, the internal transcribed spacer 1 of ribosomal DNA and the mitochondrial small subunit, were used to infer a phylogeny. Gene function was inferred from three PKS genes by the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (d N :d S ) ratios. Although seven species of Ramalina are highly supported in monophyletic clades, two other species form clusters with low support: Ramalina americana Hale is paraphyletic, and Ramalina pollinaria (Westr.) Ach. is polyphyletic. Three PKS genes were inferred to be functional but were not present in all samples. Functional PKS genes could enable adaptation to new habitats and facilitate species diversification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207