Distribution of Al and adsorption of NH<sub>3</sub> and pyridine in ZSM-12: a computational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distribution of Al and the adsorption of NH3 and pyridine in both Na-form and H-form ZSM-12 were investigated using dispersion-corrected density functional theory. It was found that the energy differences for Al atoms in the different T sites of ZSM-12 (both H form and Na form) were less than 0.3 eV, which indicates that the Al atoms could distribute in all kinds of T sites in ZSM-12. In addition, the small energy difference indicates that both H and Na atoms could stay in either the small cage or the main channel of ZSM-12. The adsorption of NH3 and pyridine on NaZSM-12 is weak, while the adsorption of NH3 and pyridine on HZSM-12 is strong, as they could form NH4+ and NC5H6+ species in the presence of protons. Both NH3 and pyridine could adsorb on the Lewis Al3+ sites in HZSM-12, while the adsorption of NH3 and pyridine on the Lewis acid sites are less stable than on the Brønsted acid sites of ZSM-12.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".