Genetically modified organisms and the World Trade Organization The EC - Biotech case at the crossroads of genetic engineering, world trade and EU politics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are controversial, especially for food and feed products, mainly due to potential benefits and potential risks. Advocates claim substantial yield improvements and reduced pesticide usage, while opponents claim contamination of non-GMO crops and damage to health and the environment. The European Union (EU) has since 2003 used a cautious approach, where GMO products are assessed on a case-by-case basis before being approved for market access or cultivation. However, within the member states opinions differ widely: Some member states are very positive to GMOs, while others have banned specific GMO products. The EU's cautious approach, before 2003 resulting in a de facto moratorium on GMOs, and the member state bans have led the United States, Canada and Argentina to start a trade dispute within the World Trade Organization (WTO), challenging EU legislation. This is the so-called EC - Biotech case. In this thesis GMOs are assessed from a sustainability point of view, that is, environmental, social and economic aspects are discussed. Moreover, EU regulations, stakeholder opinions, and relevant WTO agreements are presented, after which the trade dispute is explained, and results from the case are discussed. It is argued that the case has a negative impact on the use of the precautionary principle, and that this is a worrying trend within the WTO. In addition, the implications are discussed of the fact that the dispute panel did not take into account the most relevant multilateral environmental agreement in the field of GMOs, the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Biosafety Protocol. Moreover, it is analyzed whether the dispute will have an impact on the EU's GMO policies, resulting in the conclusion that direct impacts will likely be small, while indirect effects, such as an impact on the strength of a member state in the GMO debate, may lead to a slow change towards a more open attitude on GMOs in the EU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".