MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leukocyte‐Platelet‐Rich Plasma (<scp>L‐PRP</scp>) Induces an Abnormal Histophenotype in Craniofacial Bone Repair Associated with Changes in the Immunopositivity of the Hematopoietic Clusters of Differentiation, Osteoproteins, and <scp>TGF</scp>‐β1

2012· article· en· W1853374479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Allan Fernando Giovanini, João Ricardo Almeida Grossi, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, João César Zielak, Isabella Göhringer, Juliana de Souza Vieira, Juliane Kuczera, Marco Antonio de Oliveira Filho, Tatiana Miranda Deliberador

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone morphogenetic protein 2CD34Platelet-rich plasmaMesenchymal stem cellTransforming growth factorChemistryRUNX2CalvariaHaematopoiesisAndrologyCell biologyEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineBiologyStem cellPlateletOsteoblastIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Leukocyte-platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP) is considered an important source of growth factors, especially Transforming growth factor β 1 (TGF-β1), which modulates the proliferation and regulation of mesenchymal cells, and also exerts an influence on the hematopoiesis, osteogenesis, and adipogenesis in bone microenvironment. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of L-PRP on the calvarial bone repair and compare its results on the presence of TGF-β1, CD34, CD45, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), BMPR1B, and Runx2 proteins detected by immunohistochemistry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four bone defects were created on the calvaria of 23 rabbits. The defects were treated with autograft, L-PRP alone, and L-PRP mixed with autograft. The animals were euthanized at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-surgery. RESULTS: Unlike autograft and sham groups, the defects treated with L-PRP demonstrated significant positivity to TGF-β1, while the BMP2 was scarce. These results coincided with the lower bone matrix deposited and larger medullary area, which were composed of fibrosis, when treated with only L-PRP, or intense adiposity on defects filled with L-PRP mixed with autograft. The fibrosis that occurred was associated with a minor percentage of osteoproteins, intense presence of CD34(+) CD45(-) cells, and significant expression of TGF-β1 in all time periods analyzed. The adiposity occurred from the major presence of osteoprogenitor BMPR1B (+) Runx2(+) cells simultaneously to BMP2(-) TGF-β1(+) and CD34(+) CD45(+/-) expressions predominantly on the earlier period. CONCLUSION: From this study, it can be concluded that the L-PRP used alone or mixed to autograft hindered the osteoneogenesis due to suppression of immunoexpression of BMP2, while the immunopositivity of TGF-β1 was intense. When used alone, the L-PRP induced a fibrotic condition associated with TGF-β1 presence and lack of osteoproteins, but when L-PRP was mixed to autograft, it induced the presence of the osteolineage cells (BMPR1B (+) Runx2(+) ), but also inhibited the terminal osteoblastic maturation associated with the lack of BMP2 and the presence of TGF-β1(+) , a fact that contributed to cellular transdifferentiation into fat cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207