MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1853393167

Who Preserves? The Protection of Historic Places in Growing and Struggling Communities

2006· article· en· W1853393167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Urbaniak

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosPoliticsPolitical sciencePublic administrationCorporate governanceSociologyGeographyLawManagementEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We know little about municipal and community politics in Canada as they relate to identifying and protecting “historic” buildings, streetscapes, districts and cultural landscapes. Drawing on the experiences of the rapidly growing and generally prosperous city of Mississauga and the economically struggling Cape Breton Regional Municipality, this paper enquires into the objective indicators that could be used in future multi-municipality studies to gauge the extent to which an historic-preservation ethos is embedded into municipal governance. Measuring staff resources dedicated to heritage planning as a proportion of overall planning is critical, as is appraising the competencies and qualifications of members of the municipal heritage committee. This paper then considers several plausible preconditions to a strong municipal preservationist ethos and settles on the importance of the permeability of the local political system to the intellectual and cultural classes. Such permeability may be an aberration in many places, tending to arise during periods of political and economic crisis or dislocations. Preservationists may therefore be well advised to take full advantage of political windows of opportunity to secure not only victories on active files, but deeper, carefully designed institutional reforms. Resume Nous savons peu de choses de la maniere dont les politiques municipales et communautaires identifient et protegent les bâtiments, les rues et les paysages ou ensembles culturels « historiques ». A partir des experiences de la ville de Mississauga, prospere dans son ensemble et en croissance rapide, et de la Municipalite regionale de Cap Breton, aux prises avec des difficultes economiques, cet article s’enquiert des indicateurs objectifs qui pourraient etre utilises a l’avenir dans les etudes multi-municipales pour evaluer jusqu’a quel point l’ethos de la conservation historique s’inscrit dans la gestion municipale. Il est essentiel de prendre la mesure de la proportion des ressources humaines consacrees a la planification de la conservation du patrimoine sur l’ensemble des planifications, de meme que d’evaluer les competences et les qualifications des membres du comite municipal en matiere de patrimoine. Cet article considere donc plusieurs conditions prealables plausibles a un fort ethos « conservationniste » municipal et determine l’importance de la permeabilite du systeme politique local aux classes intellectuelles et culturelles. Une telle permeabilite peut etre une aberration en beaucoup d’endroits, tendant a emerger durant les periodes de crises ou de desorganisations politiques et economiques. Les partisans de la conservation du patrimoine seraient donc bien avises de tirer avantage de toutes les ouvertures politiques possibles pour s’assurer non seulement des victoires sur les dossiers en cours, mais egalement de reformes institutionnelles plus profondes et soigneusement preparees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207