Central giant cell granuloma of the mandibular condyle: a case report, literature review, and discussion of treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benign and malignant neoplasms of the temporomandibular joint are uncommon. Their presence poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. The central giant cell granuloma is a relatively common lesion of the jaws; however, it has been reported rarely to originate from the mandibular condyle. To date, only 5 such cases have been documented. We report a case of a large central giant cell granuloma of the condylar head with extension into the infratemporal fossa in a 29-year-old male. The patient was treated with resection and reconstruction using a costochondral graft. The signs, symptoms, and radiographic features are described and compared with the previous reports in the literature. The therapeutic options detailed in the literature have been focused mainly on lesions occupying the dentate regions of the maxilla and mandible. As such, we will review the surgical and pharmacologic options available to the surgeon and discuss their appropriateness with regard to this unique presentation of the central giant cell granuloma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".