MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

10.1016/s0967-0653(98)80308-6

2000· article· en· W185384282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eric Wolanski

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuarySedimentHydrology (agriculture)GeologyTurbiditySpring (device)OceanographyErosionSediment transportEnvironmental scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Jiaojiang River estuary, China, is very turbid with depth-averaged suspended sediment concentration commonly exceeding 10 kg m 3 at spring tides. An asymmetry of the tidal currents is caused by shallow water effects. This asymmetry generates, at spring tides a turbidity maximum in the estuary near the salinity intrusion limit. The rates of erosion and deposition are controlled by the tidal currents and the constants in the equations for those rates were inferred from 12 days of data. A transient sediment layer forms at slack tide and is eroded at a threshold velocity of about 0.3-0.4 m s -1 which is about half the value of the erosion threshold velocity of the consolidated sediment underneath. The data were used to calibrate a sediment dynamics model which was successful at reproducing most of the observations at spring tides. The model suggests that the bulk of the sediment in the estuary is imported from coastal waters. This sediment originates from the Changjiang (Yangtze) River which is located 200 km further North. The Manning's bottom friction coefficient is found to be smaller (by 30%) than that in non-turbid estuaries and this may be due to the presence of a fluid-mud layer near the bottom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)1.0001.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207