Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whereas many of the capped series of carbonyl clusters of transition metals are known, those of corresponding borane series are unknown. These include the monocapped, bicapped, tricapped, tetracapped and so on. This paper attempts to correlate selected capped series of the carbonyl series with the hypothetical corresponding ones of boranes using 14n and 4n rules. Some selected examples of capped and decapped borane series have been generated and tabulated. The borane clusters are found to follow a precise numerical algorithm. A comparison of selected examples of carbonyl cluster of lower series such as closo, nido and arachno with the corresponding borane clusters has been made. The popularly cited Rudolph system of deducing shapes of clusters is also discussed in terms of decapping series. The use of fragments and their corresponding fragment series enormously simplifies the categorization of molecular formulas into series from which their shapes can be predicted with or without the use of the cluster number (k value). The fragment series vindicates the vital Hoffmann’s isolobal concept very well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".