MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surpass the “Prototype”: a Modern Review on Liu Xie’s “Origin of Tao”

2010· review· en· W1855572828 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wang Qinghong

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyCriticismDoctrineHumanitiesPoetryArt historyArtTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carl Jung had great intests on China’s “Tao”theory and tried to conclude it into the prototype-criticism theory. Liu Xie’s “origin of Tao”theory was based upon the exploration on literary origin of Chinese traditional culture ; while Jung’s prototype-criticism emphasized on the general resemblance of human’s cultural mentality, which was parallel with Liu’s idea. However, Jung’s prototype theory was based upon religion. He concluded the prototype from the deity’s image. While the “origin of Tao”theory described the basic conformation of human’s mental culture based on human and nature’s poetic relation. The ecoesthetics ideas contained in “origin of Tao” theory’s geniality to nature might be a effective prescription for the bogged down prototype-criticism. Key Words: Origin of Tao, Prototype, Comparation, Nature, Religion Resume Interesse a la ‘‘voie’’ chinoise, Rongge s’efforce de l’integrer dans le cadre theorique de la critique de prototype. La doctrine de ‘‘voie originale’’de Liuxie, qui recherche l’origine litteraire sur la base de la culture traditionnelle chinoise, a certains points communs avec la critique de prototype de Rongge qui met l’accent sur l’investigation des analogies generales de la psychologie culturelle de l’homme. Toutefois, la doctrine de prototype de Rongge repose sur la conception religieuse et induit le protototype de l’image de dieu alors que la doctrine de la ‘‘voie originale’’construit les formes fondamentales de la culture spirituellle de l’humanite sur la base de la relaton poetique entre l’homme et la nature. La pensee esthetique de la theorie ecologique, renfermee dans la doctrine de la ‘‘voie originale’’ rapprochant de la nature, est une bonne recette pour sauver la critique de prototype en detresse. Mots-cles: la voie originale, le prototype, la comparaison, la nature, la religion 摘 要 榮格對中國的“道"極有興趣,試圖將之納入到原型批評的理論框架,劉勰“原道"說就是立足于中國傳統文化關於文學本原的探究,與榮格著眼于求索人類文化心理大體相似性的原型批評有相通之處。然而,榮格的原型說立足於宗教觀念,從神的形象中歸納出原型,而原道說則是在人與自然的詩意關係的基礎上,構建人類精神文化的基本形態。原道說對自然的親和中所蘊含的生態論美學思想不失為拯救陷入困境的原型批評的良方。 關鍵詞:原道;原型;比較;自然;宗教

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207