MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856078107 · doi:10.4324/9781315768618

Making Governments Accountable

2015· book· en· W1856078107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Government Finance and Decentralization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountabilityPolitical sciencePublic administrationParliamentMandateLegislaturePublic sectorGovernment (linguistics)AuditHouse of CommonsContext (archaeology)LawAccountingPoliticsBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword (Ian McPhee, Auditor-General for Australia) Preface Part I: Introduction and Context 1. Public Accountability: The role of the Auditor General in Legislative oversight (Zahirul Hoque and Thiru Thiagarajah) 2. Partnering with the Auditor-General's Office to Improve the Effectiveness of a Public Accounts Committee: An Auditor-General's perspective (Des Pearson) 3. Government Accountability in Sri Lanka: The roles of parliamentary oversight committees and Auditor General's office (Zahirul Hoque and Ethugalage Anura Gotabaya Ananda) 4. Parliamentarians' Relations with the Auditor General of Canada during Sheila Fraser's Mandate (2001-2011) (Danielle Morin) 5. Danish Public Sector Performance Audit: An SAI and PAC Tango (Peter Skaerbaek and Mark Christensen) Part II: Public Accounts Committees in Europe 6. The Public Accounts Committee of the House of Commons (Anthony Staddon) 7. In the Absence of a Public Accounts Committee: The Swedish experience (Louise Bringselius) Part III: Public Accounts Committees in Australia and the Pacific 8. Pragmatism, Black Letter Law and Australian Public Accounts Committees (David Gilchrist and Kylie Coulson) 9. Making a Public Accounts Committee Effective: A Chair's perspective from the state of New South Wales, Australia (Jonathan O'Dea) 10. Public Accounts Committees in the Pacific - A PEFA Perspective (Kylie Coulson and David Gilchrist) Part IV: Public Accounts Committees in Asian Regions 11. The Development of Public Accounts Committees of Bangladesh's Parliament: An overview (Sajjad H. Khan and Zahirul Hoque) 12. The Role of the Public Accounts Committee in Enhancing Government Accountability in Malaysia (Zakiah Saleh and Haslida Abu Hasan) 13. Responses to Public Accounts Committee of India: A textual analysis (Bikram Chatterjee, Alistair Brown and Victoria Wise) 14. Promoting Public Sector Accountability in Indonesia: An historical overview (Bambang Setiono and Chandra Ery Prasetyo) 15. The Public Accounts Committees in Thailand: A short note (Prapaipim Sutheewasinnon and Supot Saikaew) Part V: Public Accounts Committees in African Regions 16. Evolution and Effectiveness of the Kenyan Public Accounts Committee (Robert Ochoki Nyamori and Bosire Nyamori) 17. Strengthening PACs in Small Parliaments: Perspectives from the Caribbean (Anthony Staddon)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it