MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856159136 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2012-0198

Ecological relationships of wild rice, <i>Zizania</i> spp. 11. Electron microscopy study of iron plaques on the roots of northern wild rice (<i>Zizania palustris</i>)

2012· article· en· W1856159136 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kimberly D. Jorgenson, Peter F. Lee, Kanavillil Nandakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersLakehead University
KeywordsBiologyBotanyRhizosphereScanning electron microscopeVascular bundleBacteriaMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deposition, composition, and structure of iron plaques formed on the roots of northern wild rice (Zizania palustris L.) from five wetlands across Ontario, Canada, were examined through a scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer. Iron was oxidized within the rhizosphere resulting in the precipitation of ferric hydroxide onto root surfaces, visible as an orange-brown plaque. The northern wild rice samples analyzed were found to form substantial iron root plaques in a variety of surface water and sediment chemistries. Iron plaques ranged structurally from thin to crust plaques (&lt;1 μm to 14 μm thick) and were composed mainly of Fe, O, Al, and K. Iron plaque was found within and on root epidermal cells, occasionally filling epidermal cells and penetrating into the root cortex. Rounded grooves were observed in the plaque surface of two samples and were reasoned to have been caused by iron-reducing bacteria. Observations on the anatomy of northern wild rice roots are presented along with a model of iron plaque development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207